{"id":63013,"date":"2021-05-26T09:22:59","date_gmt":"2021-05-26T13:22:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education"},"modified":"2026-01-16T18:00:08","modified_gmt":"2026-01-16T23:00:08","slug":"bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education","status":"publish","type":"case","link":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education","title":{"rendered":"West Virginia v. B.P.J."},"menu_order":0,"template":"","supreme_court_term":[2005],"court":[1804,2299,2300,2432],"class_list":["post-63013","case","type-case","status-publish","hentry","supreme_court_term-2022-term","court-supreme-court","court-supreme-court-u-s-2023","court-supreme-court-u-s-2024","court-supreme-court-u-s-now"],"acf":{"case_number":"","featured_image":217471,"issues":[46567,46773,46781],"court_type":"scotus","case_type":"","supreme_court_term":2401,"state_territory_affiliate":[377],"status":"ongoing","date_updated":"20260116","whats_at_stake":"Becky is a student in West Virginia who is starting high school. Three years ago, as Becky was preparing to begin middle school, West Virginia passed a law categorically banning transgender girls from participating in all school sports. Becky loves being part of a team and wanted to be able to participate in cross-country and track and field with her friends. She sued, arguing that West Virginia's law violated the Constitution and Title IX as applied to her, especially because she has received medication from the onset of puberty and has never experienced any physiological changes associated with puberty for boys. As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. Becky and her mother are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of West Virginia, Lambda Legal and Cooley LLP.","call_to_action":[{"cta_text":"Show Your Support: Our Freedom Is More Than A Game","cta_url":"https:\/\/action.aclu.org\/petition\/trans-kids-scotus-our-freedom-more-game","cta_image":219507}],"summary":"Over 75 anti-trans laws were introduced in 2021. Among them was HB 3293 in West Virginia, which bans girls who are transgender from participating in school sports. This law was signed by Gov. Jim Justice despite his <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ACLU\/status\/1388150146945339394?s=20\">inability to name<\/a> any transgender athletes in West Virginia. This ban, and laws like it, are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/news\/lgbt-rights\/the-coordinated-attack-on-trans-student-athletes\/\">opposed<\/a> by women athletes, women\u2019s sports organizations, and medical experts.\r\n\r\nThe lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that banning Becky from participating in school sports with other girls just because she is transgender is unconstitutional and violates Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in schools receiving federal funding.\r\n\r\nAs a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts at the beginning of the case, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. On April 16, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that West Virginia\u2019s law excluding Becky from participating on girls\u2019 teams violated Title IX and that the district court should not have dismissed her equal protection claim.\r\n\r\nOn June 30, 2025, the Supreme Court granted West Virginia's request to review that decision.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;","case_decision":"","featured_case":false,"legal_project":"The Jon L. Stryker and Slobodan Randjelovi\u0107 LGBTQ & HIV Project (LGBTQ & HIV Project)","date_filed":null,"administration_challenged":"","constitutional_principle":["LGBT Rights"],"drupal_node_id":"99534","legal_documents":[{"court":2432,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":218747,"title":"Reply Brief for Petitioners","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251210","drupal_node_id":"103563","slug":"bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education-plaintiffs-motion-summary-judgment","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"case_docket_label","document":218037,"title":"Amicus Briefs in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251114","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":218125,"title":"Amicus Brief of Title IX Scholars in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251114","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218041,"title":"Amicus Brief of Advocates for Girls' and Women's Rights in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218044,"title":"Amicus Brief of Andraya Yearwood in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218045,"title":"Amicus Brief of Coaches, Teammates, Competitors, and Allies of Transgender Athletes in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218046,"title":"Amicus Brief of Constitutional Accountability Center in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218047,"title":"Amicus Brief of Constitutional Law Scholars in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218050,"title":"Amicus Brief of Equal Protection Scholars in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218052,"title":"Amicus Brief of Federal Jurisdiction Scholars in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218093,"title":"Amicus Brief of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders et al. in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218094,"title":"Amicus Brief of Information Society Project at Yale Law School in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218095,"title":"Amicus Brief of Law and History Scholars in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218098,"title":"Amicus Brief of Members of Congress in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218106,"title":"Amicus Brief of National Women's Law Center in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218107,"title":"Amicus Brief of New York et al. in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218108,"title":"Amicus Brief of Practicing Pediatric Endocrinologists and Pediatricians in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218111,"title":"Amicus Brief of Professional, Olympic, and International Atheletes in Women's Sports in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218112,"title":"Amicus Brief of Professors of Constitutional Law in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218113,"title":"Amicus Brief of Scholars of Equal Opportunity and Anti-Discrimination Law in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218114,"title":"Amicus Brief of the American Psychological Association et. al in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218115,"title":"Amicus Brief of the Transgender Law Center et al. in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218120,"title":"Amicus Brief of Andrew Flores in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218122,"title":"Amicus Brief of the National Education Association in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218126,"title":"Amicus Brief of Public Justice in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218128,"title":"Amicus Brief of California Women's Law Center in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218129,"title":"Amicus Brief of National Fair Housing Alliance in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218135,"title":"Amicus Brief of Professor William Eskridge Jr. in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218136,"title":"Amicus Brief of Organization of American Historians, the LGBTQ+ History Association, and Historian Scholars in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251117","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":218116,"title":"Amicus Brief of Professor Joanna Harper et al. in Support of Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251119","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":218037,"title":"Brief for Respondent","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251110","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":216492,"title":"Amicus Brief of the United States in Support of Petitioners","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250918","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":215093,"title":"Brief for Petitioners","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250912","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":193820,"title":"Reply Brief for the Petitioners","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20241029","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":193819,"title":"Respondent's Brief in Opposition","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20241015","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":185870,"title":"West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20240712","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":185868,"title":"State of West Virginia's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20240711","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null}]},{"court":2299,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":105787,"title":"Denial of Application to Vacate the Injunction Entered by the Court of Appeals","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230406","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":101589,"title":"Applicants' Application to Vacate the Injunction Entered by the Court of Appeals","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230309","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":186000,"title":"Respondent's Opposition to Application to Vacate the Injunction Entered by the Court of Appeals","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230320","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":186001,"title":"Applicants' Reply in Support of Application to Vacate the Injunction Entered by the Court of Appeals","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230322","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]}]},{"court":1856,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":155941,"title":"Opinion","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20240416","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":135374,"title":"Order Denying Motion to Suspend Injunction Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230804","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":134200,"title":"Intervenors-Appellees' Motion to Suspend Injunction Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230711","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":135017,"title":"Plaintiff-Appellant's Response to Intervenors-Appellees' Motion to Suspend Injunction Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230719","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":135018,"title":"Intervenors-Appellees' Reply in Support of Motion to Suspend Injunction Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230724","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"case_docket_label","document":63016,"title":"Amicus Briefs in Support of Appellant","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230403","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":106587,"title":"Amicus Brief of The Trevor Project","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230403","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":106588,"title":"Amicus Brief of Trans Women Athletes","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230403","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":106589,"title":"Amicus Brief of the United States","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230403","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":106590,"title":"Amicus Brief of New York et al.","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230403","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":106593,"title":"Amicus Brief of American Academy of Pediatrics et al.","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230403","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":106594,"title":"Amicus Brief of National Women's Law Center et al.","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230403","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":106595,"title":"Amicus Brief of Professional Athletes in Women's Sports et al.","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230403","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":106583,"title":"Opening Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230327","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":110139,"title":"Appellees' Response Brief and Cross-Appellant's Opening Brief","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230426","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":110137,"title":"Response\/Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant\/Cross-Appellee","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":134199,"title":"Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellee\/Cross-Appellant ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230615","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":101015,"title":"Order Granting Appellant's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230222","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":101010,"title":"Appellant's Motion to Stay Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230207","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":101011,"title":"Appellees Harrison County Board of Education and Dora Stutler's Response to Appellant's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230215","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":101012,"title":"Appellees West Virginia State Board of Education, West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission, Clayton Burch, State of West Virginia, and Lainey Armistead's Response to Appellant's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230215","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":101013,"title":"Appellant's Reply in Support of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230217","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]}]},{"court":1972,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":101020,"title":"Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230207","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":101017,"title":"Plaintiff's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230120","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":101018,"title":"Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230127","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":101019,"title":"Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230130","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":102248,"title":"Memorandum Opinion and Order","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20230105","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":63016,"title":"Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220421","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":63017,"title":"State of West Virginia Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63020,"title":"Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":63022,"title":"State of West Virginia Motion for Summary Judgment","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220421","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":63023,"title":"Plaintiff's Opposition to State of West Virginia Motion for Summary Judgment","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63025,"title":"State of West Virginia Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"case_docket_label","document":null,"title":"Replies in Support of Daubert Motions","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":63027,"title":"State of West Virginia's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for Mary Fry and to Strike Expert Opinion","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63029,"title":"State of West Virginia's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for Mary Fry","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63031,"title":"State of West Virginia's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for Deanna Adkins","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63033,"title":"State of West Virginia's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for Aron Janssen","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63035,"title":"State of West Virginia's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for Joshua Safer","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63037,"title":"Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for James Cantor","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63039,"title":"Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for Gregory Brown","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63041,"title":"Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for Stephen Levine","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63043,"title":"Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Daubert Motion for Chad Carlson","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220602","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"case_docket_label","document":null,"title":"Responses in Opposition to Daubert Motions","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":63045,"title":"State of West Virginia's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion for Gregory Brown","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63046,"title":"State of West Virginia's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion for James Cantor","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63048,"title":"State of West Virginia's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion for Chad Carlson","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63050,"title":"State of West Virginia's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Daubert Motion for Stephen Levine","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63052,"title":" Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Mary Fry ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63054,"title":"Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Deanna Adkins","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63056,"title":"Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Deanna Adkins","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63058,"title":"Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Aron Janssen","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63060,"title":"Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Joshua Safer","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"case_docket_label","document":null,"title":"Daubert Motions ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":63062,"title":"State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Mary Fry","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63063,"title":"State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Deanna Adkins","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63065,"title":"State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Aron Janssen","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63067,"title":"State of West Virginia's Daubert Motion for Joshua Safer","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63069,"title":"Plaintiff's Daubert Motion for James Cantor","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63071,"title":" Plaintiff's Daubert Motion for Gregory Brown","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63073,"title":"Plaintiff's Daubert Motion for Stephen Levine","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63075,"title":"Plaintiff's Daubert Motion for Chad Carlson","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20220512","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":63076,"title":"Order Denying Motions to Dismiss First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20211201","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"case_docket_label","document":null,"title":"Motions to Dismiss First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210730","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":63078,"title":"West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210730","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63080,"title":"Harrison County Board of Education Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210730","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63081,"title":"West Virginia State Board of Education Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210730","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63082,"title":"Consolidated Memo in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210813","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63083,"title":"West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210820","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63084,"title":"Harrison County Board Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint of Education","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210820","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63085,"title":"West Virginia State Board of Education Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210820","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":63086,"title":"Order Granting Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210721","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":63087,"title":"First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210716","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":63095,"title":"State of West Virginia Answer to First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210730","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63089,"title":"West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission Answer to First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20211215","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63090,"title":"Harrison County Board of Education Answer to First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20211215","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63093,"title":"West Virginia State Board of Education Answer to First Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20211215","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":63096,"title":"DOJ Statement of Interest","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210617","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"case_docket_label","document":null,"title":"Motion for Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":[{"child_document":63098,"title":"Memo in Support of Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63100,"title":"Declaration of Deanna Adkins MD","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63102,"title":"Declaration of B.P.J","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63104,"title":"Declaration of Mary D. Fry PhD","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63107,"title":"Declaration of Heather Jackson","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63108,"title":"Declaration of Joshua D. Safer MD","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63110,"title":"West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210622","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63112,"title":"Exhibit A","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210622","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63114,"title":"Exhibit B","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210622","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63116,"title":"West Virginia State Board of Education Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63119,"title":"Exhibit 1","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63121,"title":"Exhibit 2","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63123,"title":"Exhibit 3","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63125,"title":"State of West Virginia Response to Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63128,"title":"Exhibit A","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63130,"title":"Exhibit B","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63132,"title":"Exhibit C","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63134,"title":"Exhibit D","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63136,"title":"Exhibit E","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63138,"title":"Exhibit F","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63140,"title":"Exhibit G","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63142,"title":"Exhibit H","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63144,"title":"Exhibit I","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210623","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""},{"child_document":63146,"title":"Plaintiff's Consolidated Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210630","drupal_node_id":"","slug":""}]},{"document_options":"document","document":63148,"title":"Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20210526","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null}]}],"plaintiffs":[48465],"co-counsel":"","press_releases_related_to_cases":[88778,88811,88894,104507,105784,137711,154378,211746,217655,220198,220334],"related_content_cases":[215215,220181],"related_content_documents":"","related_content_publications":""},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>American Civil Liberties Union<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Becky is a student in West Virginia who is starting high school. Three years ago, as Becky was preparing to begin middle school, West Virginia passed a law categorically banning transgender girls from participating in all school sports. Becky loves being part of a team and wanted to be able to participate in cross-country and track and field with her friends. She sued, arguing that West Virginia&#039;s law violated the Constitution and Title IX as applied to her, especially because she has received medication from the onset of puberty and has never experienced any physiological changes associated with puberty for boys. As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. Becky and her mother are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of West Virginia, Lambda Legal and Cooley LLP.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"West Virginia v. B.P.J. | American Civil Liberties Union\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Becky is a student in West Virginia who is starting high school. Three years ago, as Becky was preparing to begin middle school, West Virginia passed a law categorically banning transgender girls from participating in all school sports. Becky loves being part of a team and wanted to be able to participate in cross-country and track and field with her friends. She sued, arguing that West Virginia&#039;s law violated the Constitution and Title IX as applied to her, especially because she has received medication from the onset of puberty and has never experienced any physiological changes associated with puberty for boys. As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. Becky and her mother are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of West Virginia, Lambda Legal and Cooley LLP.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Civil Liberties Union\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-16T23:00:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@aclu\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education\",\"name\":\"West Virginia v. B.P.J. | American Civil Liberties Union\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-26T13:22:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-16T23:00:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"Becky is a student in West Virginia who is starting high school. Three years ago, as Becky was preparing to begin middle school, West Virginia passed a law categorically banning transgender girls from participating in all school sports. Becky loves being part of a team and wanted to be able to participate in cross-country and track and field with her friends. She sued, arguing that West Virginia's law violated the Constitution and Title IX as applied to her, especially because she has received medication from the onset of puberty and has never experienced any physiological changes associated with puberty for boys. As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. Becky and her mother are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of West Virginia, Lambda Legal and Cooley LLP.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/\",\"name\":\"American Civil Liberties Union\",\"description\":\"The ACLU dares to create a more perfect union \u2014 beyond one person, party, or side. Our mission is to realize this promise of the United States Constitution for all and expand the reach of its guarantees.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"American Civil Liberties Union","description":"Becky is a student in West Virginia who is starting high school. Three years ago, as Becky was preparing to begin middle school, West Virginia passed a law categorically banning transgender girls from participating in all school sports. Becky loves being part of a team and wanted to be able to participate in cross-country and track and field with her friends. She sued, arguing that West Virginia's law violated the Constitution and Title IX as applied to her, especially because she has received medication from the onset of puberty and has never experienced any physiological changes associated with puberty for boys. As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. Becky and her mother are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of West Virginia, Lambda Legal and Cooley LLP.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"West Virginia v. B.P.J. | American Civil Liberties Union","og_description":"Becky is a student in West Virginia who is starting high school. Three years ago, as Becky was preparing to begin middle school, West Virginia passed a law categorically banning transgender girls from participating in all school sports. Becky loves being part of a team and wanted to be able to participate in cross-country and track and field with her friends. She sued, arguing that West Virginia's law violated the Constitution and Title IX as applied to her, especially because she has received medication from the onset of puberty and has never experienced any physiological changes associated with puberty for boys. As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. Becky and her mother are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of West Virginia, Lambda Legal and Cooley LLP.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education","og_site_name":"American Civil Liberties Union","article_modified_time":"2026-01-16T23:00:08+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@aclu","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education","url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education","name":"West Virginia v. B.P.J. | American Civil Liberties Union","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-05-26T13:22:59+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-16T23:00:08+00:00","description":"Becky is a student in West Virginia who is starting high school. Three years ago, as Becky was preparing to begin middle school, West Virginia passed a law categorically banning transgender girls from participating in all school sports. Becky loves being part of a team and wanted to be able to participate in cross-country and track and field with her friends. She sued, arguing that West Virginia's law violated the Constitution and Title IX as applied to her, especially because she has received medication from the onset of puberty and has never experienced any physiological changes associated with puberty for boys. As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. Becky and her mother are represented by the ACLU, the ACLU of West Virginia, Lambda Legal and Cooley LLP.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/bpj-v-west-virginia-state-board-education"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/","name":"American Civil Liberties Union","description":"The ACLU dares to create a more perfect union \u2014 beyond one person, party, or side. Our mission is to realize this promise of the United States Constitution for all and expand the reach of its guarantees.","inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"American Civil Liberties Union","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/63013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case"}],"version-history":[{"count":84,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/63013\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":220763,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/63013\/revisions\/220763"}],"acf:post":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220181"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215215"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/220334"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/220198"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/217655"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/211746"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/154378"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/137711"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/105784"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/104507"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/88894"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/88811"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/88778"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bios\/48465"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliate_info\/377"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/46781"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/46773"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/46567"}],"acf:term":[{"embeddable":true,"taxonomy":"supreme_court_term","href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme_court_term\/2401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"supreme_court_term","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme_court_term?post=63013"},{"taxonomy":"court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/court?post=63013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}