{"id":219869,"date":"2026-01-12T11:13:31","date_gmt":"2026-01-12T16:13:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/?post_type=case&p=219869"},"modified":"2026-01-12T11:13:31","modified_gmt":"2026-01-12T16:13:31","slug":"franklin-v-martinez","status":"publish","type":"case","link":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez","title":{"rendered":"Franklin v. Martinez"},"menu_order":0,"template":"","supreme_court_term":[],"court":[],"class_list":["post-219869","case","type-case","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"case_number":"","featured_image":"","issues":[46637],"court_type":"state_supreme_court","case_type":false,"supreme_court_term":null,"state_territory_affiliate":[331],"status":"ongoing","date_updated":"20260112","whats_at_stake":"This case raises the question whether New Mexico courts should retire their current, federal-centric approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution\u2014a method known as the \u201cinterstitial approach\u201d\u2014and embrace an independent approach that would allow them to more readily diverge from federal courts in light of New Mexico\u2019s own law, history, and values. The Court\u2019s decision could have major implications for New Mexicans\u2019 ability to vindicate their state constitutional rights. ","call_to_action":null,"summary":"Bryce Franklin, who is incarcerated, requested permission to buy personal items from a state-approved vendor. But the prison denied his request after the warden instructed staff to approve only orders from a single favored supplier. Mr. Franklin challenged the denial in state court, arguing that it violated his state constitutional right to \u201cacquire property,\u201d read in conjunction with his right to due process. \r\n\r\nShortly before oral argument, the New Mexico Supreme Court issued an order asking Mr. Franklin\u2019s counsel to address whether the Court should overrule its current approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution, called the \u201cinterstitial approach,\u201d and if so, what approach it should adopt instead. The interstitial approach requires New Mexico courts to look to federal jurisprudence before analyzing the state constitution itself, and to adopt independent interpretations of the New Mexico Constitution only if they can justify departing from federal precedent. \r\n\r\nBut in our system of federalism, state courts are not bound by federal precedents when interpreting their own state constitutions. We tendered an amicus brief with the ACLU of New Mexico and the Brennan Center for Justice to urge the Court to replace the interstitial approach with an independent one. Under an independent approach, state courts would look first to the New Mexico Constitution and interpret it in light of New Mexico\u2019s distinctive law, history, and values. \r\n\r\nIn our amicus brief, we argue that the interstitial approach itself was a first step on the road to state constitutional independence, but it shouldn\u2019t be the final stop. The Court has now developed a robust body of case law interpreting the New Mexico Constitution independently, so it no longer needs to rely on federal law. Nor should it: the structure of the New Mexico Constitution\u2014with many provisions that lack analogues in the U.S. Constitution\u2014and the values underlying our system of federalism support adopting a truly independent approach to state constitutional interpretation. ","case_decision":"","featured_case":false,"legal_project":"","date_filed":null,"administration_challenged":"","constitutional_principle":[],"drupal_node_id":"","legal_documents":[{"court":2449,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":219871,"title":"ACLU and ACLU-NM Amicus Brief ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251219","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null}]}],"plaintiffs":"","co-counsel":"","press_releases_related_to_cases":"","related_content_cases":"","related_content_documents":"","related_content_publications":""},"yoast_head":"\nAmerican Civil Liberties Union<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This case raises the question whether New Mexico courts should retire their current, federal-centric approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution\u2014a method known as the \u201cinterstitial approach\u201d\u2014and embrace an independent approach that would allow them to more readily diverge from federal courts in light of New Mexico\u2019s own law, history, and values. The Court\u2019s decision could have major implications for New Mexicans\u2019 ability to vindicate their state constitutional rights.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Franklin v. Martinez | American Civil Liberties Union\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This case raises the question whether New Mexico courts should retire their current, federal-centric approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution\u2014a method known as the \u201cinterstitial approach\u201d\u2014and embrace an independent approach that would allow them to more readily diverge from federal courts in light of New Mexico\u2019s own law, history, and values. The Court\u2019s decision could have major implications for New Mexicans\u2019 ability to vindicate their state constitutional rights.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Civil Liberties Union\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@aclu\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez\",\"name\":\"Franklin v. Martinez | American Civil Liberties Union\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-12T16:13:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"This case raises the question whether New Mexico courts should retire their current, federal-centric approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution\u2014a method known as the \u201cinterstitial approach\u201d\u2014and embrace an independent approach that would allow them to more readily diverge from federal courts in light of New Mexico\u2019s own law, history, and values. The Court\u2019s decision could have major implications for New Mexicans\u2019 ability to vindicate their state constitutional rights.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/\",\"name\":\"American Civil Liberties Union\",\"description\":\"The ACLU dares to create a more perfect union \u2014 beyond one person, party, or side. Our mission is to realize this promise of the United States Constitution for all and expand the reach of its guarantees.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"American Civil Liberties Union","description":"This case raises the question whether New Mexico courts should retire their current, federal-centric approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution\u2014a method known as the \u201cinterstitial approach\u201d\u2014and embrace an independent approach that would allow them to more readily diverge from federal courts in light of New Mexico\u2019s own law, history, and values. The Court\u2019s decision could have major implications for New Mexicans\u2019 ability to vindicate their state constitutional rights.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Franklin v. Martinez | American Civil Liberties Union","og_description":"This case raises the question whether New Mexico courts should retire their current, federal-centric approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution\u2014a method known as the \u201cinterstitial approach\u201d\u2014and embrace an independent approach that would allow them to more readily diverge from federal courts in light of New Mexico\u2019s own law, history, and values. The Court\u2019s decision could have major implications for New Mexicans\u2019 ability to vindicate their state constitutional rights.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez","og_site_name":"American Civil Liberties Union","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@aclu","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez","url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez","name":"Franklin v. Martinez | American Civil Liberties Union","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-01-12T16:13:31+00:00","description":"This case raises the question whether New Mexico courts should retire their current, federal-centric approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution\u2014a method known as the \u201cinterstitial approach\u201d\u2014and embrace an independent approach that would allow them to more readily diverge from federal courts in light of New Mexico\u2019s own law, history, and values. The Court\u2019s decision could have major implications for New Mexicans\u2019 ability to vindicate their state constitutional rights.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/franklin-v-martinez"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/","name":"American Civil Liberties Union","description":"The ACLU dares to create a more perfect union \u2014 beyond one person, party, or side. Our mission is to realize this promise of the United States Constitution for all and expand the reach of its guarantees.","inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"American Civil Liberties Union","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/219869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/219869\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":219872,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/219869\/revisions\/219872"}],"acf:post":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliate_info\/331"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/46637"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"supreme_court_term","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme_court_term?post=219869"},{"taxonomy":"court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/court?post=219869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}