{"id":202551,"date":"2025-03-15T07:51:07","date_gmt":"2025-03-15T11:51:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/?post_type=case&#038;p=202551"},"modified":"2025-12-22T17:19:08","modified_gmt":"2025-12-22T22:19:08","slug":"j-g-g-v-trump","status":"publish","type":"case","link":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump","title":{"rendered":"J.G.G. v. TRUMP"},"menu_order":0,"template":"","supreme_court_term":[],"court":[],"class_list":["post-202551","case","type-case","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"case_number":"","featured_image":"","issues":[46529],"court_type":"other","case_type":false,"supreme_court_term":null,"state_territory_affiliate":[371],"status":"ongoing","date_updated":"20251222","whats_at_stake":"Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act.","call_to_action":null,"summary":"The American Civil Liberties Union, Democracy Forward, and the ACLU of the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration over the president\u2019s unlawful and unprecedented invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. The Alien Enemies Act, passed in 1798, is a wartime authority providing that the president may \u2014 after a public proclamation \u2014 apprehend, restrain, and remove citizens of a foreign country that is engaged in a \u201cdeclared war\u201d or \u201cinvasion or predatory incursion\u201d against the United States. The lawsuit charges that President Trump has invoked a centuries-old wartime act unlawfully during peacetime to accelerate mass deportations, sidestepping the limits of this wartime authority and the procedures and protections in immigration law. The Alien Enemies Act\u2019s previous use during wartime \u2014 for example, its invocation during World War II to justify the internment of people of Japanese ancestry \u2014 has correctly drawn sustained criticism. Employing it as a way to evade domestic laws in peacetime against a gang is fundamentally wrong.\r\n\r\nThe initial complaint covered a nationwide class of individuals at risk of removal under the Alien Enemies Act. After the Supreme Court clarified that individuals challenging their removal under the Alien Enemies Act must bring their lawsuit in the district where they are confined, the lawsuit was amended to include individuals who were removed on March 15 to CECOT, the notorious Salvadoran prison, solely pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act. On June 4, 2025, the district court granted in part Petitioners' motion for a preliminary injunction and ruled that the government must facilitate the class's ability to seek habeas relief to contest their removal under the Alien Enemies Act. The government appealed and the appeal remains pending before the D.C. Circuit.","case_decision":"","featured_case":false,"legal_project":"","date_filed":null,"administration_challenged":"","constitutional_principle":[],"drupal_node_id":"","legal_documents":[{"court":1801,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":202552,"title":"COMPLAINT","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250315","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202553,"title":"TRO MEMO","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202560,"title":"TRO Order 1","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202604,"title":"EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250316","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202606,"title":"KOZAK DECLARATION","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250316","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202616,"title":"PLAINTIFFS\u2019 RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS\u2019 NOTICE","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250317","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202652,"title":"March 17 hearing docket details","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250317","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202780,"title":"Response to Motion to vacate TRO","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250319","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202791,"title":"Docket details for March 21 hearing","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250318","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202904,"title":"MEMORANDUM OPINION","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250324","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203076,"title":"PI Motion","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250328","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203155,"title":"DECLARATION OF OSCAR SARABIA ROMAN","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250328","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203266,"title":"Plaintiff's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203270,"title":"Exhibit A","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203272,"title":"Exhibit B","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203273,"title":"Exhibit C","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203278,"title":"Exhibit D","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203280,"title":"Exhibit E","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203281,"title":"Exhibit F","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203282,"title":"Exhibit G","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203256,"title":"Exhibit I","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203164,"title":"Exhibit J","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203257,"title":"Exhibit K","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203258,"title":"Exhibit L","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203263,"title":"Exhibit M","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203259,"title":"Exhibit N","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203262,"title":"Exhibit O","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203264,"title":"Exhibit P","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203265,"title":"Exhibit R","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203275,"title":"[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":203277,"title":"Index of Exhibits","subtitle":"","date_filed":null,"drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":205139,"title":"Contempt Order","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250416","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":205140,"title":"Contempt Opinion ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250416","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":206041,"title":"Amended Complaint","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250424","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":212621,"title":"Class Certification Motion","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250424","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":206227,"title":"Memorandum in Support of PI Motion","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250425","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":208088,"title":"Order","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250516","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":209656,"title":"PI Order","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250604","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":211836,"title":"NOTICE OF UNITED NATIONS DOCUMENT","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250707","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":211845,"title":"Exhibit 1 ","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250707","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":211846,"title":"Exhibit 2","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250707","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":219164,"title":"Memorandum Opinion","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251222","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":219165,"title":"Order","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20251222","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null}]},{"court":1812,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":202899,"title":"PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES\u2019 COMBINED BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY MOTIONS FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250318","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":202990,"title":"Federal Appeals Court Order","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250326","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":213333,"title":"CECOT ruling","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250808","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":213338,"title":"Contempt ruling","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250808","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":214512,"title":"PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES\u2019 PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250828","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null}]},{"court":1804,"documents":[{"document_options":"document","document":203152,"title":"OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION TO VACATE AND REQUEST FOR AN IMMEDIATE ADMINISTRATIVE STAY","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250401","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null},{"document_options":"document","document":204267,"title":"Supreme Court Order","subtitle":"","date_filed":"20250407","drupal_node_id":"","slug":"","child_documents":null}]}],"plaintiffs":"","co-counsel":"","press_releases_related_to_cases":[202563,202548,202596,202614,202993,203045,209659,204264],"related_content_cases":"","related_content_documents":[206588],"related_content_publications":""},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>American Civil Liberties Union<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J.G.G. v. TRUMP | American Civil Liberties Union\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Civil Liberties Union\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-22T22:19:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@aclu\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump\",\"name\":\"J.G.G. v. TRUMP | American Civil Liberties Union\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-03-15T11:51:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-22T22:19:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/\",\"name\":\"American Civil Liberties Union\",\"description\":\"The ACLU dares to create a more perfect union \u2014 beyond one person, party, or side. Our mission is to realize this promise of the United States Constitution for all and expand the reach of its guarantees.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"American Civil Liberties Union","description":"Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J.G.G. v. TRUMP | American Civil Liberties Union","og_description":"Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump","og_site_name":"American Civil Liberties Union","article_modified_time":"2025-12-22T22:19:08+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@aclu","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump","url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump","name":"J.G.G. v. TRUMP | American Civil Liberties Union","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-03-15T11:51:07+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-22T22:19:08+00:00","description":"Emergency lawsuit filed in federal court to halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/cases\/j-g-g-v-trump"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/","name":"American Civil Liberties Union","description":"The ACLU dares to create a more perfect union \u2014 beyond one person, party, or side. Our mission is to realize this promise of the United States Constitution for all and expand the reach of its guarantees.","inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"American Civil Liberties Union","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/202551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case"}],"version-history":[{"count":38,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/202551\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":219167,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/202551\/revisions\/219167"}],"acf:post":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document\/206588"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/204264"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/209659"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/203045"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/202993"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/202614"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/202596"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/202548"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press_release\/202563"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/affiliate_info\/371"},{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue\/46529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"supreme_court_term","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme_court_term?post=202551"},{"taxonomy":"court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/court?post=202551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}